A couple of months ago a decision by the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) shocked the arbitration community: The ECJ decided in its (in)famous Achmea-decision that EU member states must not settle their disputes in arbitration proceedings agreed upon in bilateral intra-EU investment treaties (see https://www.globalarbitrationnews.com/ecj-stops-investment-arbitration-intra-eu/). The reasoning of Achmea was that EU member states are bound to use the judicial system established by the European Union. Settling disputes in private arbitration proceedings would, according…
In its decision 4A_260/2017 rendered on 20 February 2018, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court declined to set aside…
The case of Agile Holdings Corp v Essar Shipping Ltd[1] clarifies the circumstances in which the court can…
In April 2018, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Halliburton Company v (1) Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (2) [M] (3) [N] (4) [P] [2018] EWCA Civ 817, in which Halliburton applied sought M’s removal on the grounds that circumstances existed that gave rise to justifiable doubts as to M’s impartiality under section 24(1)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (the “AA 1996”) The overall factual backdrop is the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Halliburton Company (“Halliburton”)…
The rejection of SCM Financial Overseas Ltd’s (“SCM”) challenge to an US$ 860 million award in favour of…
On 16 May 2018, Global Arbitration Review published a report on the Netherlands newly published draft model BIT.…
Investment treaty arbitrations may be brought under the rules of many different arbitration institutions. As can be expected, each institution has its unique rules and associated collection of risks and benefits. The updated table below[1] provides a quick reference guide for the rules of several key institutions, the SIAC, the SCC, ICSID, UNCITRAL, CIETAC and the PCA. Click here to view the Pdf version. This is a simplified guide intended to provide an overview of the…
The question whether arbitration agreements cover cartel damages claims is highly disputed. Recently, the Regional Court Dortmund took…
“Creeping Americanization of international arbitration: is it the right time to develop inquisitorial rules of evidence?”[1] A session…
The London Court of International Arbitration (the “LCIA”) has recently published its Casework Report for 2017 which contains statistics on its performance last year.[1] The report makes for an interesting comparison with the 2016 report.[2] This article examines the LCIA’s 2017 figures, making comparisons also with those of the International Chamber of Commerce (the “ICC”),[3] where appropriate. Caseload The LCIA received 303 referrals in 2016, 253 of which fell under the LCIA rules (LCIA acting…