Factual Background Litigation ensued after a catastrophic turbine failure at the Hadjret En Nouss Power Plant (the “Plant”) in Tipaza, Algeria. Various insurers, reinsurers, and retrocessionaires (collectively, the “Insurers”) initiated litigation as subrogees of the plant owner, Shariket Kahraba Hadjret En Nouss (“SKH”). SNC-Lavalin Constructeurs International Inc. (“SNC”) had operated the Plant on behalf of SKH, and had entered a Services Contract and various other contracts with General Electric International, Inc. and other GE entities…
Etrak Insaat Taahhut Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Libya, No. 22-cv-864 (D.D.C. Feb. 4, 2025)[1] Factual Background In October…
In Re: Amitiza, No. 21-11057-MJJ, (D. Mass. Jan. 27, 2025)[1] Factual Background In 2004, Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sucampo”) entered…
A. LEGISLATION AND RULES A.1 Legislation The United States is a federal jurisdiction that has arbitration-related legislation at both the federal (national) and state levels. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) of 1925 continues to be the controlling federal arbitration statute and reflects a well-established national policy that strongly favors arbitration as an alternate means of dispute resolution. On a bipartisan, bicameral basis, Congress agreed on a draft national data privacy standard, the American Privacy Rights…
A. LEGISLATION AND RULES A.1 Legislation International arbitration in Canada is, for the most part, a matter of…
Hernandez v. Sohnen Enterprises, Inc., 102 Cal. App. 5th 222 (2024), reh’g denied (June 3, 2024)[1] Factual Background In 2016,…
Conti 11. Container Schiffarts-GMBH & Co. KG M.S. v. MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A., 91 F.4th 789 (5th Cir. 2024)[1] Factual Background In November 2000, Mediterranean Shipping Company (“MSC”), a Swiss corporation based in Geneva, chartered M/V FLAMINIA, a cargo vessel, from Conti, a German corporation. The charter agreement required all disputes arising thereunder to be arbitrated in London. From 2000 to 2012, MSC operated the FLAMINIA without issue. In June 2012, a Houston-based employee of…
Welcome to the 17th edition of the Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. We are pleased to bring you…
Edmundson v. Klarna, S.A., No. 22-557-cv, 85 F. 4th 695 (2d Cir. 2023)[1] Factual Background Klarna, Inc. offers online…
FCM Inv., Inc. v. Grove Pham, LLC, No. RIC1902326 (Cal. Super. Ct. Oct. 17, 2023)[1] Factual Background In January 2019, Plaintiff FCM Investments, LLC (“FCM”), signed a purchase agreement to buy property in Riverside, California, from Defendant Grove Pham, LLC (“Grove”), a company owned by Phuong Pham. Grove operated a nursing home on this property. Disputes arose and were mediated during the due diligence process, but FCM pulled out of the amended deal before escrow…