Search for:
Category

North America

Category
In USA

District court grants motion requiring parties to arbitrate, holding that right to arbitrate had not been waived despite three years of litigation

by and 4 Mins Read

In Re: Amitiza, No. 21-11057-MJJ, (D. Mass. Jan. 27, 2025)[1] Factual Background In 2004, Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sucampo”) entered into a marketing agreement with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. (collectively, “Takeda”). The marketing agreement included a 16-year exclusive licensing arrangement for certain drugs, which came to include Amitiza. In 2012, a predecessor to Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Par”) had its application accepted to sell a generic version of Amitiza. Sucampo…

Read More
In USA

USA: Appellate court reverses the trial court’s order granting motion to withdraw from arbitration and litigate in state court as otherwise permitted under California Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.97

by 3 Mins Read

Hernandez v. Sohnen Enterprises, Inc., 102 Cal. App. 5th 222 (2024), reh’g denied (June 3, 2024)[1] Factual Background In 2016, Plaintiff Massiel Hernandez (“Hernandez”) executed an arbitration agreement with Defendant Sohnen Enterprises, Inc. (“Sohnen”), that stated, “This Agreement is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”), 9 U.S.C. [section] 1, et seq.” On July 16, 2021, Hernandez filed a complaint against Sohnen for disability discrimination, Labor Code violations, and related causes of action. On November 8, 2021,…

Read More
In USA

Second Circuit decides that provider of “buy now, pay later” service afforded online purchasers clear and conspicuous notice of an arbitration agreement and that purchaser unambiguously manifested assent to that agreement

by and 3 Mins Read

Edmundson v. Klarna, S.A., No. 22-557-cv, 85 F. 4th 695 (2d Cir. 2023)[1] Factual Background Klarna, Inc. offers online shoppers the opportunity to purchase products and, free of any interest or fees, repay Klarna for the balance in regular instalments. Najah Edmundson used those services in 2021, and Klarna collected the instalments from her checking account shortly thereafter. Edmundson’s account balance, however, was deficient at the time of collection, so the financial institution associated with her…

Read More
In USA

District court rules that it cannot compel arbitration where parties contracted to arbitrate pursuant to now-defunct DIFC LCIA Rules

by 3 Mins Read

Baker Hughes Saudi Arabia Co. v. Dynamic Industries, Inc., Civ. A. No. 2:23-cv-1396 (E.D. La. Nov. 6, 2023)[1] Factual Background Plaintiff Baker Hughes Saudi Arabia Co. Ltd. (“Baker Hughes”) contracted with Dynamic Industries Saudi Arabia, Ltd. (and other related Dynamic Industries entities named in the case as Defendants (collectively, “Dynamic”)) to supply materials, products, and services for an energy project Dynamic was working on in Saudi Arabia. The parties’ contract required that disputes, if not…

Read More
Load More