Grupo Unidos por el Canal, S.A. v. Autoridad del Canal de Panama, 78 F.4th 1252 (11th Cir. 2023)[1] Factual Background Grupo Unidos por el Canal (“Grupo Unidos”) is a consortium of European companies that was awarded a multi-billion dollar construction contract by Autoridad del Canal de Panama (“Autoridad del Canal”) to expand the Panama Canal. When Grupo Unidos completed the expansion twenty months past the deadline, liability disputes followed. Pursuant to the contract’s arbitration clause, any…
Baker Hughes Saudi Arabia Co. v. Dynamic Industries, Inc., Civ. A. No. 2:23-cv-1396 (E.D. La. Nov. 6, 2023)[1]…
A. Legislation and rules A.1 Legislation The United States has a federal form of government, and there is,…
A. LEGISLATION AND RULES A.1 Legislation International arbitration in Canada is, for the most part, a matter of provincial jurisdiction. Each province and territory has enacted legislation adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law, occasionally with slight variations, as the foundational law for international arbitration. Canada’s federal parliament has also adopted a commercial arbitration code based on the UNCITRAL Model Law, which is applicable when the federal government or one of its agencies is a party to…
First Kuwaiti Gen. Trading & Contracting W.L.L. v. Kellogg Brown & Root Int’l, Inc., No. 1:23-mc-1 (E.D. Va.…
Baker Hughes Servs. Int’l, LLC v. Joshi Technologies Int’l, Inc., Nos. 21-5072 and 21-5081 (10th Cir. July 13,…
LaRubInt Corp. v. Joint Stock Company Studio Soyuzmultfilm, No. 22-cv-4461 (HG) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2023)[1] In August and September 2016, LaRubInt Corp., a U.S. media marketing company, entered into three licensing agreements with Joint Stock Company Studio Soyuzmultfilm (“Studio Soyuzmultfilm”), a Russian film studio. These licensing agreements provided LaRubInt with the exclusive right, in the territories of East and Southeast Asia, India, the Unites States, and Canada, to use and market images, goods, and services related…
In Equicare Health Inc. v. Varian Med. Sys.,[1] the District Court for the Northern District of California vacated…
On June 23, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a very important decision concerning the procedure to be followed…
Blasket Renewable Investments v. Kingdom of Spain, No. 1:21-cv-3249-RJL (D.D.C. Mar. 29, 2023).[1] Factual Background In 2007, two Dutch companies, AES Solar Energy Coöperatief U.A. and Ampere Equity Fund B.V. (collectively, the “Companies”), invested in renewable energy projects in order to take advantage of favorable tax incentives offered by the Kingdom of Spain (“Spain”). However, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, Spain implemented reforms in its energy sector that had the effect of…