Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al. v. Converteam SAS, No. 17-10944 (11th Cir. 2018) [click for opinion] Plaintiff Outokumpu Stainless, LLC (“Outokumpu”), through its predecessor ThyssenKrupp Stainless USA LLC, entered into three agreements to purchase from a company called Fives three “cold running mills” (“CRMs”) (the “Contracts”). All three Contracts contained arbitration clauses. They also contained a provision stating that the terms would be binding on subcontractors. Fives entered into a subcontract with GE Energy…
Thompson v. AT&T Serv., Inc., No. 17 C 3607 (N.D. III. Sept. 24, 2018) [click for opinion] Plaintiff brought…
Kiraly v. Forcepoint, Inc., No. A-2676-17T1 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Oct. 2, 2018) [click for opinion] In January…
Daesang Corp. v NutraSweet Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 06331 (App. Div. 1st Dept. 2018) [click for opinion] A dispute between Daesang Corporation (“Daesang”) and the NutraSweet Company (“NutraSweet”) arose out of the 2003 sale of Daesang’s aspartame business to NutraSweet. Daesang brought claims in an ICC arbitration against NutraSweet for failure to pay the purchase price, along with claims for breach of the processing agreement, most notably for NutraSweet’s termination of the agreement without cause.…
Floridians for Solar Choice, Inc. v. PCI Consultants, Inc., No. 15-cv-62688 (S.D. Fla. June 11, 2018) [click for…
Recom Corp. v. Miller Bros., No. 16-3320, (D.N.J. Aug. 16, 2018) [click for opinion] In June 2014, electrical…
Johnson v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 16 C 5468 (N.D. III. Sep. 20, 2018) [click for opinion] Plaintiff Charles Johnson sued Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) for sending an unsolicited text message in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. Johnson downloaded the Uber app in July 2013. As part of his signing up to use the app, Johnson agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of the Uber…
Zacher v. Comcast Cable Commc’ns, No. 17-cv-7256 (N.D. Ill. June 20, 2018) [click for opinion] Plaintiff brought a…
On September 30, 2018, the United States, Mexico and Canada (the Parties) reached an agreement to replace the…
Hardy Exploration & Prod. (India), Inc. v. Gov’t of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Civil Action No. 16-140 (D.D.C. June 7, 2018) [click for opinion] In 1997, Hardy Exploration & Production (India), Inc. (“HEPI”) entered into a contract with the Government of India (“India”) that would allow HEPI to search for and potentially extract hydrocarbons from an area off of India’s southeastern coast (the “Block”). The contract provided that if HEPI found crude…