Search for:
Category

USA

Category

On June 23, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a very important decision concerning the procedure to be followed when a district court denies a party’s request to compel arbitration. See Coinbase v. Bielski, No. 22-105, __ U.S. __ (June 23, 2023). Under 9 U. S. C. §16(a), when a federal district court denies a motion to compel arbitration, the losing party has a statutory right to an interlocutory appeal. The question for the Supreme Court,…

Veerji Exports v. Carlos St Mary, Inc., No. 22 Civ. 3661 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2022)[1] Factual Background Plaintiff Veerji Exports (“Veerji”) contracted with BVC Brink’s Diamond and Jewellery Services LLP (“BVC”), the designated agent of Defendant Brink’s Global Services, Inc. (“Brink’s”), to ship diamonds from Surat, India to Defendants Carlos St. Mary and Carlos St. Mary, Inc. (collectively, “St. Mary”) in Houston, Texas. Pursuant to the contract, BVC issued a house airway bill (“HAWB”), which…

A.         LEGISLATION AND RULES A.1 Legislation The United States is a federal jurisdiction that has arbitration-related legislation at both the federal (national) and state levels. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) of 1925 continues to be the controlling federal arbitration statute and reflects a well-established national policy that strongly favors arbitration as an alternate means of dispute resolution. In its almost 100-year history, the FAA had not seen any major amendments.[1] However, such an amendment…

Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, v. Coverteam SAS (aka GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp.,), No. 17-10944 (11th Cir. July 8, 2022)[1] Factual Background In 2007, the predecessor of Plaintiff Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC (“Outokumpu”) entered into a series of agreements with F.L. Industries Inc. (“Fives”) for the provision of three cold rolling mills used for manufacturing and processing steel products. The parties agreed that disputes arising from the agreements would be subject to arbitration under German…