Search for:
Category

Hong Kong

Category

The Hong Kong courts consistently adopt a robust and purely mechanistic approach to applications resisting enforcement of awards, but they will refuse enforcement in appropriate circumstances. In the case of A v R1 and Another [2024] HKCFI 1511, the Court of First Instance (CFI) refused to enforce two related Mainland awards because various failings in the first arbitration seriously affected the structural integrity of the arbitral process and undermined due process, and the basic notions…

On 1 June 2024, the 2024 Administered Arbitration Rules of the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre will come into effect. The 2024 Rules can be accessed here. The 2024 Rules maintain HKIAC’s “light touch” approach to case administration, which respects party autonomy and has been a fundamental feature of HKIAC administered arbitrations. This means that parties who have adopted arbitration under the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules in force when the arbitration commences can rest assured…

In G v N [2023] HKCFI 3366, an arbitrator decided on illegality under Hong Kong law applying the wrong test. G sought to set aside the awards, among others, on the ground that they are in conflict with Hong Kong public policy on illegality, alternatively for the matter to be remitted to the arbitrator to give him an opportunity to eliminate the setting aside grounds. The Court found that the awards were in conflict with…

A. LEGISLATION AND RULES A.1 Legislation A.1.1 Hong Kong expands financing options for arbitration parties Third-party funding is an arrangement by which the funder receives a financial benefit only if the funded party is successful in the proceedings. It is contingent — the funder takes a risk that the claim will not succeed, while the funded party has a reduced financial risk. Third-party funding for arbitrations, arbitration-related court proceedings and mediations has been permitted in Hong Kong…