Search for:
Category

Germany

Category

In a recent decision, the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt defined the requirements and limits in which the losing party in an arbitration can defend itself against the arbitral award with counterclaims at the stage of enforcement proceedings in Germany.[1] Facts of the case: The Higher Regional Court Frankfurt had to deal with an application to declare an ICC award enforceable in Germany. The background to the dispute was a contract concerning the purchase of…

What ultimately matters is to win your case, isn’t it? To that end, you need to convince the arbitral tribunal. Lawyers trust in the power of legal arguments and neglect psychology. If you are different, you may want to attend a talk next Monday, March 22, at 12:15 CET. The event is part of the Hamburg Arbitration Days and organized by BAUMANN Resolving Disputes. To know more about this event, please click here.

German law strictly protects the secrecy of the deliberations of a court and therefore does not allow the publication of dissenting opinions of lower court judges. This is for several reasons: Firstly, if the judges can stay anonymous and do not need to fear being pinned down in a dissenting opinion of a colleague, they are more inclined to openly express their views during the deliberations. Secondly, the publication of dissenting opinions could encourage and…

On 20 September 2019, ICSID registered a request by the Austrian construction company STRABAG SE (“Strabag”) for the initiation of an ICSID arbitration proceeding (ICSID Case No. ARB/19/29). Strabag and two of its affiliates (“Erste Nordsee-Offshore Holding GmbH” and “Zweite Nordsee-Offshore Holding GmbH”) are suing the Federal Republic of Germany for damages in a still unknown amount. So far, no documents are public except for the notification of a request for arbitration. The notification, however, clearly shows…