Search for:
Category

North America

Category

Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., No. C18-1360-TSZ (W.D. Wash. Apr. 16, 2019) Devas Mutlimedia Private Ltd. (“Devas”) brought an action to confirm a foreign arbitral award issued against Antrix Corp. Ltd. (“Antrix”), an entity owned and controlled by the Government of India. Antrix moved to dismiss Devas’s petition on the grounds that Antrix was not subject to the court’s jurisdiction and based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens.In its evaluation of…

NTCH-WA, Inc. v. ZTE Corp., No. 17-35833 (9th Cir. Apr. 25, 2019) NTCH-WA, Inc. is one of a number of affiliates that operate together under the name “ClearTalk” and offer prepaid and flat-rate cell phone service to customers with poor credit or who otherwise cannot open accounts with major cell phone providers. The ClearTalk entities filed suit in California against ZTE Corp.’s wholly-owned subsidiary, ZTE USA, for breach of contract and other related causes of…

Castro v. TriMarine Fish Co. LLC, No. 17-35703 (9th Cir. Feb. 27, 2019) [click for opinion] Plaintiff Castro was injured while working as a deck hand aboard a fishing vessel owned by Defendants, several TriMarine companies (collectively referred to as “TriMarine”). Castro, a citizen of the Philippines who had relocated to American Samoa, had an employment agreement with TriMarine calling for arbitration in, and subject to the procedural rules of, American Samoa. After his injury,…

Gretton Ltd. v. Republic of Uzbekistan, No. 18-cv-01755 (D.D.C. Feb. 6, 2019) [click for opinion] Petitioner, Gretton Ltd. (“Gretton”), is a litigation funder. Following the alleged expropriation of two gold-mining operations run by Oxus Gold PLC (“Oxus”) in the Republic of Uzbekistan, Gretton funded an arbitration on behalf of Oxus in return for an assignment of the proceeds of any award. In 2015, an arbitral panel sitting in Paris found Uzbekistan liable for approximately $10…