Search for:
Category

North America

Category

Eolica Tres Mesas, S. de R.L. de C.V. v. Abengoa Mexico S.A. de C.V., No. 1:18-cv-07505 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2019) [click for opinion] In June 2014, Eolica Tres Mesas, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Eolica Tres Mesas 2, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Eolica”) entered into a subcontractor relationship with general contractor Abengoa Mexico S.A. de C.V. (“Abengoa”) under a Balance of Plant Agreement (“BOP Agreement”) relating to the development of a 45-turbine wind…

Safran Elec. & Defense SAS v. iXblue SAS, No. 1:18-cv-07220 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2019) [click for opinion] In 1993, the predecessor of iXblue SAS (“iXblue), a navigation imaging company organized in France, licensed certain fiber-optic gyroscope (“FOG”) “know how” to the predecessor of Safran Electronics & Defense SAS (“SED”), a French avionics and electronics supplier. The license agreement contained an arbitration clause covering any disputes arising between the parties related to the agreement. That clause…

We are pleased to announce that the twelfth edition of The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook is now available. This edition reviews important developments in arbitration in the past year across 45 jurisdictions, including changes to the settlement of investor-State disputes, the ongoing uncertainty around the future of intra-EU BITs following the European Court of Justice’s decision in Achmea, the continued push for procedural efficiency, and revised national laws relating to the funding of arbitration…

China Shipping Container Lines Co. Ltd. v. Big Port Serv. DMCC, No. 15 Civ. 2006 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2019) [click for opinion] Through a series of subcontracts, Big Port Service DMCC (“BPS”) supplied marine fuel oil to a vessel owned by CSCL Container Lines Co. Ltd. (“CSCL”). After one of the intermediary contractual parties’ affiliates filed for bankruptcy, BPS sought payment of its outstanding invoice directly from CSCL. However, BPS’s contract to supply the fuel—and…