Pott v. World Cap. Props., Ltd., No. 24-13071 (11th Cir. Sept. 24, 2025)[1] Factual Background Alfredo Carlos Pott entered into a Stock Option Agreement (“SOA”) with World Capital Properties, Ltd. (“WCP”) containing an International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) arbitration clause. Gonzalo Lopez-Jordan was not a signatory to the SOA. When Pott later filed an ICC arbitration naming Lopez-Jordan as a respondent, Lopez-Jordan objected to the tribunal’s jurisdiction over him as a non-signatory. However, Lopez-Jordan, through…
Factual Background Mike Lindell is a Minnesota businessman, commonly known as the “My Pillow Guy.” Lindell repeatedly claimed…
Factual Background Litigation ensued after a catastrophic turbine failure at the Hadjret En Nouss Power Plant (the “Plant”)…
Etrak Insaat Taahhut Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Libya, No. 22-cv-864 (D.D.C. Feb. 4, 2025)[1] Factual Background In October 2012, Libya contracted with a Turkish corporation, Etrak Insaat Taahhut Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi (“Etrak”), for the performance of public-construction projects. Libya never paid Etrak for the work. Etrak sought recovery in a Libyan court, which entered a judgment for Etrak. The parties then agreed to settle any related claims for roughly 5.4 million Libyan Dinar (about…
In Re: Amitiza, No. 21-11057-MJJ, (D. Mass. Jan. 27, 2025)[1] Factual Background In 2004, Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sucampo”) entered…
A. LEGISLATION AND RULES A.1 Legislation The United States is a federal jurisdiction that has arbitration-related legislation at…
Hernandez v. Sohnen Enterprises, Inc., 102 Cal. App. 5th 222 (2024), reh’g denied (June 3, 2024)[1] Factual Background In 2016, Plaintiff Massiel Hernandez (“Hernandez”) executed an arbitration agreement with Defendant Sohnen Enterprises, Inc. (“Sohnen”), that stated, “This Agreement is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”), 9 U.S.C. [section] 1, et seq.” On July 16, 2021, Hernandez filed a complaint against Sohnen for disability discrimination, Labor Code violations, and related causes of action. On November 8, 2021,…
Conti 11. Container Schiffarts-GMBH & Co. KG M.S. v. MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A., 91 F.4th 789 (5th…
Edmundson v. Klarna, S.A., No. 22-557-cv, 85 F. 4th 695 (2d Cir. 2023)[1] Factual Background Klarna, Inc. offers online…
FCM Inv., Inc. v. Grove Pham, LLC, No. RIC1902326 (Cal. Super. Ct. Oct. 17, 2023)[1] Factual Background In January 2019, Plaintiff FCM Investments, LLC (“FCM”), signed a purchase agreement to buy property in Riverside, California, from Defendant Grove Pham, LLC (“Grove”), a company owned by Phuong Pham. Grove operated a nursing home on this property. Disputes arose and were mediated during the due diligence process, but FCM pulled out of the amended deal before escrow…