Search for:
Category

USA

Category

SteppeChange LLC v. VEON Ltd., No. 18-cv-04842 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2018) [click for opinion] Plaintiff SteppeChange, LLC (“SteppeChange”) a California-based tech company, was involved in two projects, under two separate oral agreements, with Dutch cellular phone and data service provider VEON Ltd. (“VEON”), and its Italian subsidiary, Wind Tre S.p.A. (“Wind” and collectively with VEON, “Defendants”). The first project involved developing a customer messaging platform (the “Button Project”), and the second involved developing a…

Forby v. One Technologies, L.P., No. 17-10883 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2018) [click for opinion] On April 24, 2015, Vickie Forby filed a class action in state court in Illinois against One Technologies, L.P. (“One Tech”) for violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“ICFA”). The case was later removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. In the notice of removal, One Tech did not…

Dye v. Tamko, No. 17-14-052 (11th Cir. Nov. 2, 2018) [click for opinion] Two Florida residents purchased the same type of “Heritage 30” shingles (hereinafter “the shingles”) from Tamko Building Products (“Tamko”) for their respective roofs. The shingles came with a 30-year limited warranty, the language of which was printed in full on the outside wrapper of each shingle package. This limited warranty contained a mandatory arbitration clause that was also printed in its entirety, and…

To paraphrase Pharaoh Ramses II, so it is written, so it shall be done. In Schein, Inc. v. Archer and White Sales, Inc., 586 U.S. __ (January 8, 2019), the first opinion by Justice Kavanaugh, a unanimous Supreme Court reiterated this principle of the Federal Arbitration Act. Specifically, the Court confirmed that when an arbitration agreement delegates to an arbitrator the question of whether the agreement applies to a particular dispute, courts have no power to decide…