In Nesbitt v. FCNH, Inc., No. 14-1502 (10th Cir. Jan. 5, 2016), the Tenth Circuit upheld the denial of a motion to compel arbitration, finding arbitration prohibitively expensive for Plaintiff under the terms of the arbitration agreement. Plaintiff, a student at a for-profit academic institution offering massage therapy courses, brought a putative class action against the institution under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and state laws for requiring massage therapy students to perform massages on…
Any company that makes sales through the Internet to New Jersey consumers should be aware of a recent…
In Hayes v. Delbert Servs. Corp., No. 15-1170 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2016), the Fourth Circuit refused to…
In its decision in Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC v. Scout Petroleum, LLC, 809 F. 3d 746 (3d Cir. 2016), the Third Circuit held that general reference to arbitration under AAA rules does not constitute clear and unmistakable evidence that the parties delegated the question of class arbitrability to the arbitrators. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC (“Chesapeake”) entered into various oil and gas leases with landowners in several Pennsylvania counties in 2008. Scout Petroleum, LLC and Scout II, LP…
In a nutshell, arbitration must fulfil two main aims to be attractive to its potential users: enforceability of…
In a decision of 23 June 2015,[1] the Austrian Supreme Court (“OGH”) decided on an action to set…
Terra Holding GmbH and Terra Handels-und Speditionsgesellschaft mbH v. Unitrans International, Inc., No. 14-cv-1788 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2015), the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia compelled arbitration of the question of arbitrability where the arbitration agreement incorporated Vilnius Court of Commercial Arbitration rules that delegated that decision to the arbitrators. Plaintiffs, Terra Holding GmbH and Terra Handels-und Speditionsgesellschaft mbH (both German entities), sued Defendant, Unitrans International, Inc. (a U.S. corporation), for, inter…
Arbitrability: The Limits of Arbitration on 7 April 2016, 12.00-2.00pm Venue: CCLS, room 3.1, 67-69 Lincoln’s Inn Fields,…
We are pleased to announce that the new edition of The Baker & McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook is now available.…
Parties who choose arbitration as an exclusive dispute resolution mechanism for their contracts usually agree that their disputes “shall” be referred to arbitration. In certain circumstances, however, parties intentionally agree on arbitration as a default dispute resolution mechanism with an option to litigate a dispute, or vice versa. The option can either be held by both parties (bilateral option clauses) or, more commonly, by one party only (unilateral option clauses). In either case, it is…