Search for:
Category

Europe

Category

In Micula v. Romania,[1] a D.C. district court judge recently enforced an investor-state arbitration award in a case brought by nationals of a European Union (“EU”) state against another EU state. This is the first decision by a U.S. court concerning enforcement of an “intra-EU” investment treaty award since the European Court of Justice’s decision in the Achmea case[2] last year, which held that such awards are not enforceable. Several cases seeking enforcement of intra-EU…

In its decision dated 28 May 2019 (case No. 4A_543/2018 (in German), selected for publication in the official court reporter), the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (SFSC) addressed a number of issues involving the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) concerning inter alia: the point of time when the international character of a sales agreement is determinedthe express and implied exclusion of the CISGthe parallel application of the Swiss provisions on…

While it hasn’t been a record year for most arbitral institutions, the demand for arbitration is still very strong. As in the previous years, we have compiled the numbers published by the arbitral institutions to date. Recently, the ICC made its 2018 statistics report available for download. We had a look at these numbers and updated this blog post. We will update this blog post again when further statistics become available (1). We also compare…

Traditionally in the Czech Republic, both national and foreign arbitration awards could have been enforced either in standard court enforcement proceedings or in proceedings administered by court-appointed bailiffs. While procedurally enforcement through a bailiff is an alternative to the enforcement through a court, the former possesses a few clear advantages. Some of the advantages include the absence of a court fee or the more pro-active role of the bailiff when it comes to investigating the…