Introduction The rules around the law applicable to an arbitration agreement generate considerable discussion in arbitration circles, both in England and elsewhere. The two candidates of usual choice are (i) the law applicable to the underlying agreement containing the arbitration agreement and (ii) the seat (legal place) of the arbitration (i.e., curial law), which is often stipulated in the arbitration agreement. The position under English law was not entirely clear, giving rise to confusion and…
For several years there has been turmoil within the EU around the potential termination of bilateral investment treaties…
M&A transactions, which typically involve share purchase agreements, asset purchase agreements, shareholder agreements and joint venture arrangements, are…
In Tricon Energy Ltd v MTM Trading LLC [2020] EWHC 700 (Comm), the English High Court granted a rare successful appeal against an arbitral award pursuant to section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 and held that the arbitral tribunal had been wrong to conclude that the claim was not contractually time barred. Background MTM Trading LLC (the “Owners”) were the owners of a vessel which was charted to Tricon Energy Ltd (the “Charterers”) under…
The Finland Arbitration Institute (“FAI”) administers domestic and international arbitrations governed by its Arbitration Rules and the Rules…
Paris Court of Appeal, 25 February 2020, No. 17/18001 Prakash Steelage Ltd. (“Prakash Steelage” or “Respondent”), an Indian…
The case concerns a damage claim between a Luxembourg company and the Republic of Poland. The arbitral tribunal determined, in one separate and one final award, that Poland had violated its obligations under an intra-EU bilateral investment treaty (BIT) between Poland, Luxembourg and Belgium by expropriating the Luxembourg company’s shareholdings in a Polish bank, and subsequently, the company was entitled to damages. The awards were challenged by Poland inter alia on the grounds that the…
The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the Court has jurisdiction to compel the evidence of third party…
In The Republic of Korea v Mohammed Reza Dayyani and others [2019] EWHC 3580 (Comm), the English High…
At the beginning of 2020, it became known that the Polish airline company LOT decided to purchase its German rival which was part of the Thomas Cook Group which became insolvent in 2019. The deal was signed in January, but on 13 April 2020, it became known that LOT pulled out of the deal because of COVID-19.[1] This is a prominent example, but certainly not the only example where a purchaser of a company might try…