In 2017, the Swiss Government released a draft bill aiming at a reform of the Swiss international arbitration legislation. On 9 June 2020, after several rounds of discussions and amendments in the two Swiss parliamentarian Chambers, the final version of the international arbitration law reform was approved. Key features of the reformed Swiss international arbitration legislation The main new features of the reformed Swiss international arbitration legislation (enshrined in Chapter 12 of the Private International Law…
In Xstrata Coal v Benxi Iron & Steel ([2020] EWHC 324 (Comm))[1], the English High Court permitted a…
The role of the courts in the development of arbitration proceedings is undeniably crucial. The 15th Civil Chamber of…
Introduction The rules around the law applicable to an arbitration agreement generate considerable discussion in arbitration circles, both in England and elsewhere. The two candidates of usual choice are (i) the law applicable to the underlying agreement containing the arbitration agreement and (ii) the seat (legal place) of the arbitration (i.e., curial law), which is often stipulated in the arbitration agreement. The position under English law was not entirely clear, giving rise to confusion and…
For several years there has been turmoil within the EU around the potential termination of bilateral investment treaties…
M&A transactions, which typically involve share purchase agreements, asset purchase agreements, shareholder agreements and joint venture arrangements, are…
In Tricon Energy Ltd v MTM Trading LLC [2020] EWHC 700 (Comm), the English High Court granted a rare successful appeal against an arbitral award pursuant to section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 and held that the arbitral tribunal had been wrong to conclude that the claim was not contractually time barred. Background MTM Trading LLC (the “Owners”) were the owners of a vessel which was charted to Tricon Energy Ltd (the “Charterers”) under…
The Finland Arbitration Institute (“FAI”) administers domestic and international arbitrations governed by its Arbitration Rules and the Rules…
Paris Court of Appeal, 25 February 2020, No. 17/18001 Prakash Steelage Ltd. (“Prakash Steelage” or “Respondent”), an Indian…
The case concerns a damage claim between a Luxembourg company and the Republic of Poland. The arbitral tribunal determined, in one separate and one final award, that Poland had violated its obligations under an intra-EU bilateral investment treaty (BIT) between Poland, Luxembourg and Belgium by expropriating the Luxembourg company’s shareholdings in a Polish bank, and subsequently, the company was entitled to damages. The awards were challenged by Poland inter alia on the grounds that the…